Hallac-ı Mansur Issue and Cübbeli Ahmet
- okukitap.net
- Sep 16, 2023
- 3 min read
In fact, it is not possible to have even an iota of faith in Cübbeli Ahmet and his followers, who agree with Mansur. Because faith consists of the confirmation (verification) of ideas (knowledge).
Hallac-ı Mansur, in a parliament; He claims "I am Allah" and is tried in the court of time for this statement; He states that he still stands by his claim that the words he said in court were not "accidental" or "excited" words. The court sentenced Hallac to the death penalty. No problem so far. However, Ahmet Ünlü, known publicly as Cübbeli Ahmet, claims that Mansur is a saint and therefore, although his words are against the Sharia, this is not the case in reality. Continuing; He narrates what Mansur and Iblis talked about. Since Mansur is dead, he must be the one who narrated from Iblis. The demon narrator goes further and says; He says that opposing Mansur will endanger the faith. What kind of faith is this that can be replaced by a person instead of God, who is a necessary being? Is it possible for a rational person to take Ahmet Ünlü and the foolish people who follow him seriously? Their shenanigans are natural because their Famous subjects, the messengers of Satan, have put reason aside.
In fact, it is not possible to have even an iota of faith in Cübbeli Ahmet and his followers, who agree with Mansur. Because faith consists of the confirmation (verification) of ideas (knowledge). The fact that guidance comes from Allah does not prevent this situation. Moreover, the fact that guidance comes from Allah cannot be taken to mean that Allah believes on our behalf. Therefore, faith is a natural event. It is merely a confirmation of accurate information. The basis of mental certain knowledge is based on necessities and impossibilities. The main issue here is that a person does not use his mind or denies the decision reached by his mind due to reasons such as stubbornness and arrogance. If a person does not use his mind once and does not submit to the rules of reason, he can never have reason again with his own means. It is only possible for a person to return to the path of reason and to progress on the path of reason (not to be arrogant and stubborn) with the guidance given by Allah. I mean this. Faith is never an aphakic, contrary to reason. Muslims are not priests; Let them say, "Believe it even if you don't understand it." The rudeness, dishonesty, great lies and clowning committed by Hallac-ı Mansur are obvious. Although he was a possible being, he claimed that he was a necessary being, and even in court he declared that he was a necessary being, but despite this, the necessary being died. Can there be a man whose lies and deceit are clearer than this? So, if he hadn't died... Now, if we speak ill of this liar Mansur, our faith will be in danger, right? No, never... On the contrary, those who confirm Mansur do not have an iota of faith or reason.
Cübbeli Ahmet says, "Mansur (who said I am Allah) was in a spiritual position." He puts many lies in order through this position. What kind of spiritual rank can a rude person who says "I am Allah" and a top liar have? Even if it were, what ugly spiritual position is this? No religion on earth accepts disrespect for its god, only today's so-called Sufis do. The crux of the issue is this. All kinds of evil are found in those who reject the rules of the mind and sharia in the name of Sufism and break away from certainty by saying spirituality and heart. There is not much difference between today's Sufi religion, which was created in the whirlpool of compassion, conscience and aphorisms, and Christianity. There is not much difference between the mystics and the priests who expect us to accept their nonsense words and understandings even if we do not understand them. We witness every day that it does not happen.
Comments